Most journalists who write about evolution appear to have made their choice to be flacks and toadies for the godlike biologists.
To summarize, the authors use a terrible design hypothesis, and make ever-escalating claims of certainty from two weak observations.
How is any of this constitutional? How do these discriminatory guidelines not break federal civil rights laws?
“Oscar Wilde said nature imitates art,” Meyer said. And today we’re going to see that “technology is able to imitate and even in some ways, improve on nature.”
A journal article suggests that an impressive instance of unguided evolution has been directly witnessed.