Take a simple example, one that Rosenhouse finds deeply convincing and emblematic for biological evolution.
On Monday, I will look at the consistency of the phylogenetically informative sites for the Baum et al. (2016) paper. Spoiler alert: It looks like design.
Richard Dawkins predicted that “a large fraction” of our genomes has no function, because, “The true ‘purpose’ of DNA is to survive, no more and no less.”
Eric Bapteste, a researcher at Sorbonne University, just co-authored a review discussing genetic change in the context of aging.
To those who say ID advocates are only critical of Darwinism because they are not sufficiently versed in genetics, I have a two-word reply.