Richard Dawkins predicted that “a large fraction” of our genomes has no function, because, “The true ‘purpose’ of DNA is to survive, no more and no less.”
Eric Bapteste, a researcher at Sorbonne University, just co-authored a review discussing genetic change in the context of aging.
To those who say ID advocates are only critical of Darwinism because they are not sufficiently versed in genetics, I have a two-word reply.
Evolutionists do not mind if selection goes forward, backward, up, down or sideways, as long as Darwin’s honor is maintained.
If mutations are the raw material for evolution, they are like explosives with unpredictable effects.