Increasingly, the direction of research points away from a materialist view in which information is seen as a byproduct of matter.
Previously, I questioned a theistic evolutionist’s claim that we can’t rule out chance as an explanation for something unless the probability of chance working can be calculated accurately.
Calling it by a new name doesn’t change the essence of a theory relying on chance.
What does the new book have to offer the perplexed today that previous works don’t?
Researchers may not call it ID, but what else do you call admiration for natural engineering that inspires attempts to imitate it?