Biologists often claim that coevolutionary interactions, as with bees and flowers, can alter the fitness landscape to drive evolutionary changes.
England’s research is focused on the wrong question. Origin-of-life theories are not helped by identifying processes that efficiently dissipate energy.
A common attempt to overcome the need for information in the first cell is to equate information to a reduction in entropy.
A fundamental hurdle facing all origin-of-life theories is the fact that the first cell must have had a free energy far greater than its chemical precursors.
In an article here yesterday, I described the thermodynamic challenges to any purely materialistic theory for the origin of life.
Popular articles on origin-of-life research often portray the field as constantly advancing and quickly converging on a purely materialistic explanation for the first cell.
As the authors rigorously show, producing anything of significant complexity requires that knowledge of the outcomes be programmed into the search routines.
On a trip to Northeast campuses, I had the privilege of speaking to students about the evidence for design in nature.
Without calling it a series, I’ve written several articles recently that followed a logical path.
In a previous article I described how theories of innovation provide insight into the limits of natural selection.