The English literacy critic and biographer A.N. Wilson is a brilliant writer. We’ve been aware for some time that he’s a Darwin skeptic, too.
If one insists on and is committed to naturalism, then naturalistic, evolutionary, explanations are what you will find.
“[U]nder certain conditions, matter inexorably acquires the key physical attribute associated with life.” Oh, really, does it?
If textbooks evolve, then what we thought we knew yesterday is no longer true today.
Theodosius Dobzhansky famously wrote in 1973 that “Nothing in Biology Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution.”
England’s research is focused on the wrong question. Origin-of-life theories are not helped by identifying processes that efficiently dissipate energy.
University of Glasgow chemist Paul Braterman explains “How to slam dunk creationists.”
It is an enormous problem to explain how such capabilities evolved.
According to evolution, the species arose as a consequence of random events, such as mutations.
In arguing for 75 percent of the human genome as trash, has Dr. Graur slain the ENCODE dragon and rescued the Junk DNA myth? Nah.