No threat to science today is in any way comparable to that posed by the state church of post-modern naturalism.
Previously, I questioned a theistic evolutionist’s claim that we can’t rule out chance as an explanation for something unless the probability of chance working can be calculated accurately.
Calling it by a new name doesn’t change the essence of a theory relying on chance.
What does the new book have to offer the perplexed today that previous works don’t?
Scientism is the belief that science explains literally everything.