Watch this short feature on Bethell, “Iconoclast: One Journalist’s Odyssey Through the Darwin Debates.”
Dr. Marks is obviously right. A sculpture has more information than the raw material from which the image was sculpted.
And a bad year for a 19th-century creation myth. It’s understandable that Darwinists are a bit dejected.
Insofar as Peebles’s work helps to strengthen the evidence for a cosmic beginning, it is actually part of the argument for intelligent design.
Dr. Berlinski questions evolutionary understandings of language and expresses doubt as to what reproductive benefit could have accrued to “the first guy to master the Greek subjunctive.”