We love evolutionist Jerry Coyne in part because unlike more wary Darwinists, he blunders into contradictions all the time that expose the inconsistencies in his view of the world.
Dr. Egnor, in contrast to Dr. Coyne, has worked with, operated on, and helped many children with the conditions that Coyne thinks should justify killing them.
The Google diversity memo story is rich in ironies.
One just needs the terminal diagnosis — sometimes mistaken — to qualify for the lethal pills.
Materialist philosopher Joseph Carter denies the existence of teleology in nature, but he is mistaken.
When ideologies reign, one of the first victims, invariably, is truth. The narrative is supreme, and it deforms how information is interpreted.
This is not a slippery slope. This is an ice cliff.
Jerry Coyne argues, astonishingly, that the vulnerability of handicapped children justifies killing them.
Sarah Chaffee spoke to AF proponents in Alabama, Oklahoma, and Texas.
For science reporters, misinformation on a hot story was “Too good to check.”