Skip to content
Evolution News Logo

EVOLUTION NEWS

& SCIENCE TODAY

Menu
  • Science
      • EvolutionEvolution
      • MedicineMedicine
      • Human OriginsHuman Origins
      • Neuroscience and MindNeuroscience & Mind
      • Intelligent DesignIntelligent Design
      • Physics, Earth, and SpacePhysics, Earth & Space
      • Life SciencesLife Sciences
    Close
  • Culture
      • Culture & EthicsCulture & Ethics
      • NewsmediaNews Media
      • EducationEducation
      • Faith & ScienceFaith & Science
      • Free SpeechFree Speech
    • Close
  • Writers
      • andrew-mcdiarmid-headshotAndrew McDiarmid
      • Bioinformation SymposiumDenyse O’Leary
      • beheMichael Behe
      • paul-nelson-headshotPaul Nelson
      • wittJonathan Witt
      • ann-gauger-headshotAnn Gauger
      • douglas-axe-headshotDouglas Axe
      • michael-denton-headshotMichael Denton
      • stephen-meyer-headshotStephen Meyer
      • chaffee-1Sarah Chaffee
      • david-berlinski-headshotDavid Berlinski
      • john-west-headshotJohn West
      • egnorMichael Egnor
      • smithWesley Smith
      • gsimmons-tnGeoffrey Simmons
      • david-klinghoffer-headshotDavid Klinghoffer
      • wellsJonathan Wells
      • dr_brian_miller_headshot-22Brian Miller
      • michael-flannery-headshotMichael Flannery
      • en-orange-boxEvolution News
    • Close
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
  • About
  • Spanish Edition
  • 01.17.21
  • |
  • Search

Category: Culture

Culture & Ethics IconCulture & Ethics
Michael D. Aeschliman
January 8, 2021, 6:38 AM

Shaw, Scientism, and Darwinism

George Bernard Shaw’s positive criterion by which to measure and ridicule folly and vice was fatally ambiguous, eclectic, and inconstant.

Culture & Ethics IconCulture & Ethics
David Klinghoffer
January 7, 2021, 2:18 PM

Bright Idea: Put Scientists in Charge Instead?

Could scientists and advocates of scientism really make a worse hash of things than the politicians?

Faith & Science IconFaith & Science
Tom Winkler
January 7, 2021, 1:15 PM

On the Road with Our Supporters

These two young ladies are representative of many others who are desperately seeking our message of purpose and hope.

Culture & Ethics IconCulture & Ethics
Michael D. Aeschliman
January 7, 2021, 6:48 AM

Darwinism as the Root Problem of Modernity

Shaw and Chesterton believed that the acceptance of Darwinism made it impossible to resist social Darwinism, plutocracy, imperialism, racialism, and militarism.

Culture & Ethics IconCulture & Ethics
Michael D. Aeschliman
January 6, 2021, 6:54 AM

Shaw, Chesterton, and the Critique of Darwinism

Chesterton was a friend of Shaw but also an ideological opponent, who often debated with him on public stages.

Posts navigation

Prev Page1 Page2 Page3 Page4 Page5 … Page837 Next

Trending

  • RNA World: Repeated Downfalls, Repeated Resurrections
  • Avi Loeb: “Nature Does Not Produce Such Things”
  • How to Destroy Love with Darwinism
  • How Materialists Rely on Intelligent Design
  • Atheist Christopher Hitchens: Best Evidence for Intelligent Design?

Recommended

  • A Physician Describes How Behe Changed His Mind
  • Life’s Origin — A “Mystery” Made Accessible
  • Codes Are Not Products of Physics
  • Ixnay on the Ambriancay Plosionexhay
  • Design Triangulation: My Thanksgiving Gift to All
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Search
© 2021 Discovery Institute