I had fantastic translation assistance from a Summer Seminar alumnus and valued colleague, Quezia Salgado, and my talk went well.
The author, Dean Schulz, an engineer with a PhD in computer science, takes a “bottom up” approach.
These claims represent a classic but false “junk DNA” argument against intelligent design.
Computer scientist Winston Ewert applied the concept of “common design” to propose a “dependency graph” model of organismal relationships.
It’s simply false for Dawkins to claim that when you compare genes of different animals, they “fall on a perfectly hierarchy — a perfect family tree.”