A primary reason why many biologists never question the standard evolutionary model is their very limited training in mathematics.
One of the central pillars of the standard evolutionary model is the belief that all living species evolved from a common ancestor through a gradually unfolding tree of life.
In a previous article I described how scientific training can condition some scientists’ minds to resist the evidence in nature for intelligent design.
After following the discussion about evolution versus design for the past few decades, I have noticed a common trend.
A recent series of critiques, published by the online journal Sapientia, was aimed at Doug Axe’s book, Undeniable.