The evidence commonly cited to argue for evolution’s ability to drive large-scale transformations is almost always circular.
A biologist in our network worked as a postdoctoral researcher at Harvard. He recounted how about a quarter of the postdocs he encountered were at least sympathetic to design arguments.
One of most popular attempts at explaining the flagellum via cooption was developed by Nicholas Matzke.
I saw that biologist Nathan Lents says that he has been asked to review Mike Behe’s new book.
The standard evolutionary model is incapable of driving major transformations such as a fish evolving into an amphibian.