A CNN headline claims, “Blame genetics for bad driving, study finds.” “Genes for,” however, are dangerous words in genetics.
The most popular naturalist account today is that a non-human past accounts for our minds, attitudes, values, beliefs, and behavior.
Naturalism (the view that it’s material nature all the way down) hasn’t fared much better with human language than with consciousness.
What if the answers to some scientific questions were correct but defined as outside the bounds of science?
Actually, it is somewhat unusual during the reign of naturalism for so much dissent to come from within the discipline, as it has in neuroscience.