Search Results for: 'methodological naturalism'
Is The Design of Modern Science Defective?: A review of Science’s Blind Spot: The Unseen Religion of Scientific Naturalism
[Editor’s Note: This post was written by a Discovery Institute legal intern, Guillermo Dekat. Mr. Dekat is a law student at St. Mary’s University in San Antonio, Texas. He holds a bachelor’s degree in biology from the Air Force Academy.] A review of Science’s Blind Spot: The Unseen Religion of Scientific NaturalismBy: Cornelius G. Hunter (Brazos Press, 2007) In law, one who sells a product in a defective condition unreasonably dangerous to the user is held strictly liable for the physical harm to the injured party. One way for the injured party to win a case is to successfully argue that there is a design defect in the product. Put another way, the plaintiff is entitled to damages because there Read More ›
Does the Panda Argument Hurt the Case for Evolution?
Gould cannot have it both ways: either theology-laden arguments are legitimate within scientific discourse or not.
Is Evolution’s “Third Way” Natural? (And Are We Allowed to Reference It?)
As the body of evidence against the Darwinian model has grown ever larger, many scientists have started peeling off to look for other options.
From Nature, a Devastating Critique of Origin-of-Life Research
The magazine started by Norman Lockyer in 1869 to promote Darwin’s naturalistic views has had to face judgment day.
Rescuing Chance for Darwinism
When papers claim that Darwinism works by selecting unspecified and unplanned variations, do their best empirically studied examples demonstrate it?