The theory of natural selection was the co-discovery of two men, but by the mid 1860s one of its progenitors began to reject his own theory.
We must never confuse scientific consensus with science. Science is inquiry. Consensus is cloture of inquiry.
Artificial sperm offer the transhumanist dream of radical individualistic procreation, baby manufacture, and radical family restructuring.
Richard Dawkins and David Attenborough are celebrating this new development as a victory over the “creationists.”
What is wrong with “dancing in the DMZ” between intelligent design and neo-Darwinism? Are these two positions the only alternatives?