The new evidence is very ambiguous and totally inconclusive. No far-reaching conclusions should be drawn from such dubious material.
The new fossils stem from a layer in the Nama Group of Namibia, just below an ash bed that could be radiometrically dated to 547.32 ± 0.65 million years.
Günter Bechly explains why the Precambrian fossil Namacalathus fails as a transitional precursor to the Cambrian explosion.
An evolutionist dismantles natural selection, then tries to rescue it with his own theory. It won’t work.
None of the Cambrian animal phyla is represented in the Ediacaran fossil record.