Wells encourages more than a modest dose of skepticism, and gives the example of the supposed “backward wiring of the vertebrate eye” as a case in point.
How many Americans accept Darwin’s belief that human beings are the result of an unguided, purposeless process? This survey doesn’t come close to telling us.
He is not at all THAT sort of person, the kind one might expect to find waging a campaign against modern evolutionary theory.
Critics of intelligent design will have a hard time maligning Neil Thomas as a “creationist in a cheap tuxedo.”
Darwinian evolution will never succeed in disentangling itself from racism because it must always have its “official subhuman.”