Evolution is an implication — that is, an empirical consequence — of design.
As I read through the scientific literature of evolutionary biology to try and convince myself of its accuracy and coherence, I was struck by the frequency with which I encountered “religious” language.
A muddle emerges from textbooks’ unprincipled use of theology.
Swamidass’s response doesn’t address our main arguments, but he indicates he is impressed by what Darwinian mechanisms accomplished in generating chloroquine resistance.
“The human eye is a well-tread [sic] example of how evolution can produce a clunky design,” writes Professor Lents.