Author: Robert F. Shedinger
Reading Between the Lines: Intelligent Design in Philip Ball’s Non-ID Book
Ball, in describing this new biology, feels the need to appeal to design language despite his overt disavowal of any support for intelligent design.
What Really Happened at the Huxley-Wilberforce Debate?
The stereotype portraying Wilberforce as the pompous bishop rejecting Darwin on theological grounds is easily dispelled.
Darwin’s Bluff — Continued
Recently, I turned up some later letters showing that Darwin’s bluff extended well beyond 1863.
Darwin’s “God Wouldn’t Do It This Way” Argument
A book widely hailed as proposing a true mechanism for evolution actually reads more like an anti-creationist polemic.
Does the World Need Another Book About Darwin?
We need to let Darwin speak for himself. It turns out that Darwin, given the opportunity, is quite capable of dismantling his own mythology.