How many Americans accept Darwin’s belief that human beings are the result of an unguided, purposeless process? This survey doesn’t come close to telling us.
Whether their question was chosen intentionally to inflate the degree of support for “evolution,” I cannot say.
We test intelligent design in the same way that we test all historical scientific theories.
The editors’ action was unethical. Given the stakes in the controversy over allowing biological males to take over women’s sports, it was also immoral.
The term “anti-evolution” has been used for decades, over and over, by untold numbers of defenders of Darwin and critics of the theory of intelligent design.