Tag: Eugenie Scott
Equivocation as a Tactic in the Evolution Debate
How many Americans accept Darwin’s belief that human beings are the result of an unguided, purposeless process? This survey doesn’t come close to telling us.
Survey Artificially Inflates the Percentage of Americans who “Accept Evolution”
Whether their question was chosen intentionally to inflate the degree of support for “evolution,” I cannot say.
Answering an Objection: “You Can’t Measure Intelligent Design”
We test intelligent design in the same way that we test all historical scientific theories.
Unprecedented? The News Media Put Words in Someone’s Mouth!
The editors’ action was unethical. Given the stakes in the controversy over allowing biological males to take over women’s sports, it was also immoral.
What’s Wrong with Calling Intelligent Design “Anti-Evolution”?
The term “anti-evolution” has been used for decades, over and over, by untold numbers of defenders of Darwin and critics of the theory of intelligent design.