Skip to content
Evolution News Logo

EVOLUTION NEWS

& SCIENCE TODAY

Menu
  • Science
      • EvolutionEvolution
      • MedicineMedicine
      • Human OriginsHuman Origins
      • Neuroscience and MindNeuroscience & Mind
      • Intelligent DesignIntelligent Design
      • Physics, Earth, and SpacePhysics, Earth & Space
      • Life SciencesLife Sciences
    Close
  • Culture
      • Culture & EthicsCulture & Ethics
      • NewsmediaNews Media
      • EducationEducation
      • Faith & ScienceFaith & Science
      • Free SpeechFree Speech
    • Close
  • Writers
      • andrew-mcdiarmid-headshotAndrew McDiarmid
      • Bioinformation SymposiumDenyse O’Leary
      • beheMichael Behe
      • paul-nelson-headshotPaul Nelson
      • wittJonathan Witt
      • ann-gauger-headshotAnn Gauger
      • douglas-axe-headshotDouglas Axe
      • michael-denton-headshotMichael Denton
      • stephen-meyer-headshotStephen Meyer
      • chaffee-1Sarah Chaffee
      • david-berlinski-headshotDavid Berlinski
      • john-west-headshotJohn West
      • egnorMichael Egnor
      • smithWesley Smith
      • gsimmons-tnGeoffrey Simmons
      • david-klinghoffer-headshotDavid Klinghoffer
      • wellsJonathan Wells
      • dr_brian_miller_headshot-22Brian Miller
      • michael-flannery-headshotMichael Flannery
      • en-orange-boxEvolution News
    • Close
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
  • About
  • Spanish Edition
  • 01.17.21
  • |
  • Search

Tag: Extended Evolutionary Synthesis

Evolution IconEvolution
David Klinghoffer
October 16, 2020, 1:23 PM

A Darwinist Recognizes (Some of) the Stakes in the Intelligent Design Debate

I would be curious to hear how Darwinists like Dr. Freestone reconcile their evolutionism not just with religion but with their commitment to human equality.

Evolution News @DiscoveryCSC
June 1, 2020, 5:22 PM

Reeves: Natural Selection, Explanatory Deficits, and Bunnies (Dark and Light)

The story includes the neo-Darwinian modern synthesis and the extended evolutionary synthesis, culminating in a 2016 meeting of the Royal Society.

Paul Nelson
February 21, 2020, 12:19 PM

I Disagree with David Klinghoffer, But It’s My Fault for the Confusion

Evolution is an implication — that is, an empirical consequence — of design.

David Klinghoffer@d_klinghoffer
May 22, 2019, 5:10 PM

An Unhappy Couple: Paul Nelson Reports on the Cambridge “Evolution Evolving” Meeting

Nelson offers a comparison from the world of dating. We’ve all seen it: the supposedly content pair where one partner is in fact clearly “looking around.”

Evolution News @DiscoveryCSC
February 14, 2019, 4:51 AM

Science Review Offers False Accusations about Chloroquine Resistance

In one paragraph Lents et al. twice cited sources they thought contradicted Behe, and twice suggested he ignored or dismissed contrary evidence.

Posts navigation

Page1 Page2 Page3 Next

Trending

  • RNA World: Repeated Downfalls, Repeated Resurrections
  • How to Destroy Love with Darwinism
  • How Materialists Rely on Intelligent Design
  • Avi Loeb: “Nature Does Not Produce Such Things”
  • Atheist Christopher Hitchens: Best Evidence for Intelligent Design?

Recommended

  • A Physician Describes How Behe Changed His Mind
  • Life’s Origin — A “Mystery” Made Accessible
  • Codes Are Not Products of Physics
  • Ixnay on the Ambriancay Plosionexhay
  • Design Triangulation: My Thanksgiving Gift to All
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Search
© 2021 Discovery Institute