I have the unique distinction of having contributed in the same year to the Festschrifts of both Phil Johnson and Richard Dawkins. I feel a bit like a double agent.
I want to underscore Phil’s pivotal role in organizing disparate voices critical of Darwinism and convinced of design in nature into a cohesive community.
In Darwinist argumentation, Phillip Johnson found a panoply of euphemism and wishful thinking masquerading as evidence.
Michael Ruse aims at a surprising conclusion in his new book. Weikart isn’t buying it.
Professor Weikart discusses a recent book by philosopher Michael Ruse on Darwinism, Christianity, and war.