Did Neil deGrasse Tyson purposefully misstate a book’s title to bash religion?
Driven by a materialistic agenda, Cosmos shuts up as haunted the tabooed territory of religion’s positive influence on the development of science.
Materialists project a religion-friendly image because popular culture expects it, while at the same time they make arguments to erode religious belief.
But other Darwin defenders seem to confirm Dembski’s predicted “zero-concession policy,” refusing to admit when their own camp makes a mistake.
Even when you try to disregard the evidence for design in nature, it nevertheless speaks for itself.