Why do so many academic biologists and other scholars resist the design implications of Doug Axe’s research?
If the reigning materialist paradigm had even a tolerably convincing weight of evidence behind it, I would be the first to accept it.
I think he’s mistaken my emphasis in the specific car break-in examples I gave, namely that the burglars’ behavior was odd and unpredictable.
As a colleague points out, Nagel’s departure from the “right-thinking consensus” is on a par with David Gelernter’s 2019 farewell to Darwinism.
The wet-washcloth sensation of puppy tongue on baby cheeks is part of the baby’s evidence that Puppy exists.