Clearly a naturalistic bias is at work here and imposes a limit on the spectrum of alternative explanations that is even considered to be permissible.
He concludes that “evolutionary ‘just so’ stories” are examples of “wishful thinking starved of molecular details.”
If the universe were a radio and the desired setting allows for life, it would have dozens of dials for setting the values of the universal constants.
I also have a scheme that I believe can defeat the generalized second law. My scheme is called “intelligence.”
The greatest engine of atheism in modern times — Darwin’s theory — is nothing more than a bastardization of the strongest philosophical argument for God’s existence.