“A brilliant indictment of scientific groupthink by an unapologetic intellectual dissident.”
Andrew McDiarmid concludes his two-part conversation with Michael Aeschliman.
It’s too bad biologists are not as open about crises in their theories. It’s the sign of a healthy science.
Insofar as Peebles’s work helps to strengthen the evidence for a cosmic beginning, it is actually part of the argument for intelligent design.
Against the backdrop of materialist science’s failure, what accounts for the rise of modern determinist mythologies, led by astrology and transhumanism?