Darwinism is committed to evolution happening gradually, one step at a time, by single mutational changes.
The take-home lesson is that evolution, on its best day, is an embarrassingly anemic process.
Unsatisfied with circular evolutionary arguments and lazy reasoning, Michael Behe decided to pose his question to the real-world data.
Evolution’s grand tree-of-life story requires constructive evolution, not more and more cases of organisms tossing parts overboard.
Are scientists in Texas catching malaria in the act of evolving, or is something else going on?