I wonder whether Farina has in fact read Behe’s book for himself, or whether he is relying upon others, such as Nathan Lents.
Darwinism is committed to evolution happening gradually, one step at a time, by single mutational changes.
The take-home lesson is that evolution, on its best day, is an embarrassingly anemic process.
Unsatisfied with circular evolutionary arguments and lazy reasoning, Michael Behe decided to pose his question to the real-world data.
Evolution’s grand tree-of-life story requires constructive evolution, not more and more cases of organisms tossing parts overboard.