Tag: Response to Criticism
About Those Amazon Reviews of Darwin’s Doubt
Those negative reviews that actually review parts of the book focus repeatedly on Stephen Meyer’s presumed error in claiming that the Cambrian event poses a problem.
A Graduate Student Writes
Having for years defended Darwin’s theory, Nick Matzke has determined to learn something about it as a graduate student at UC Berkeley, an undertaking in the right spirit but the wrong order.
From The New Yorker, Backhanded Compliments for Darwin’s Doubt
The logjam against intelligent discussion of intelligent design in the mainstream media is finally unjamming.
A Countercultural Appetite for Darwin’s Doubt
The standard Darwinian tactic is to ignore plausible counterarguments, and when that no longer suffices, to smear authors as creationists who don’t understand science.
More Scientists Endorse Darwin’s Doubt: Meet Biologist Mark C. Biedebach
“A truly remarkable book….[L]eaves macroevolution sitting atop a boundary (or wall) with an outlook no better that that of Humpty Dumpty.”