No better advertisements for intelligent design exist than works written by establishment scientists that unintentionally make design arguments.
That framing is backwards, or perhaps upside-down, probably in order to make the paper by Granville Sewell sound unreasonable.
A helpful formulation comes from podcaster Scott Adams, of “Dilbert” fame, who comments entertainingly on the political scene.
As imaging techniques approach nanometer resolution, the detailed workings of molecular mechanisms reveal precision engineering designs.
Berlinski tempts Peter Robinson to ask him whether he still considers himself an agnostic.