Because of Phillip Johnson’s leadership no informed person will ever again honestly say that Darwin’s theory flows straight from the data.
During my early years of graduate school, I was wrestling with the question of whether I was an unintended accident of nature or the product of a Creator.
There is some evidence that once again, the diapason of opinion is being changed. The claims of intelligent design are too insistent and too plausible to be frivolously dismissed.
There are innumerable descriptions and definitions of theistic evolution. How things are phrased matters a lot.
“The human eye is a well-tread [sic] example of how evolution can produce a clunky design,” writes Professor Lents.