Initially, I was pleased to find someone who might be an interesting new participant in the evolution debate.
Textbook publishers use their influence over kids and the appearance of neutrality to advance a set of strong biases.
Most of us think of science as the enterprise of seeking truth by formulating hypotheses and testing them against the evidence. This is empirical science.
“The human eye is a well-tread [sic] example of how evolution can produce a clunky design,” writes Professor Lents.
In a physical world there will be design constraints, so it is only realistic to expect tradeoffs.