In arguments, the same logical fallacies are committed again and again. Two textbook examples are floridly on display in an article from Psychology Today.
One thing that draws me to the ID movement is that it has the polite and understated ethic that science is supposed to have — but does not have when the subject is evolution.
Many ENV readers will be familiar with the Nilsson and Pelger paper that purports to show how the emergence of the complex mammalian eye is no problem at all for undirected natural selection.
It’s also called “Bad Faith.” Here is how it works.
As the course proceeds, perhaps students will learn more about what else Dr. Noor considers factual. I have generated a list of candidate “facts” for his consideration