Paul Kecskemeti’s analysis perfectly describes the challenge faced by anyone who wishes to publicly tell the truth about the evidence for design.
Just a few days ago, a former atheist endorsed Evolution News as the “best place” to read about topics relating to science, design, Darwinism, and faith.
A major news story can break outside of the silo but, because it goes against the narrative, those in the silo will never hear about it.
It is all about the costs of getting on the wrong side of the power structure. To say that this “chills” debate about scientific issues is an understatement.
Critics of intelligent design (ID) often lecture ID proponents that they are free to submit their work to any scientific journal.