“If anyone thinks that the study of science and faith should be disparate disciplines, here are more than 656 reasons why they’re wrong.”
Whether their question was chosen intentionally to inflate the degree of support for “evolution,” I cannot say.
Once again, Darwinists seek to avoid an argument by using clever talk, giving the false impression of a scientist, Behe, who brushes away challenges.
We have a lonely hypothesis standing by itself in the center of the room, which no one, including its author, will own as true.
Does philosopher of biology Paul Nelson reject “mainstream science”? Of course he does not.