There is clearly a pattern of discontinuities that requires an adequate explanation, and Darwinism is not it.
I urge you to review this important series. Humbly place it at the feet of your favorite Darwinist, atheist, or theistic evolutionist.
If identified as an animal, it would “predate the Cambrian explosion of bilaterian animal phyla as a kind of ‘advance guard.’”
I will flesh out the concept of biological information, and I will explain why significant quantities of it cannot be generated through natural processes.
If you’re going to engage people on the topic of intelligent design publications, don’t let them force two false assumptions on you.