I have no idea what King would have thought of the modern theory of intelligent design, but many of the ideas he expressed are certainly friendly to ID.
The Darwinian view encourages a way of interacting with others where the aim is to “humiliate [one’s] lesser brethren, just to remind them who’s boss.”
An evolutionist dismantles natural selection, then tries to rescue it with his own theory. It won’t work.
Douglas Ell’s concept is a dialogue between Doubt and Reason, who sass each other merrily.
Evolutionists are still fighting over the first animals. Each new fossil creates new questions, but there is one constant: bluffing that Darwinism is true.