As for the “God of the gaps” charge, the basic objection is that ID is an argument from ignorance, based upon what we don’t know.
Materialists who purport to explain the origin of nature’s complexity by smuggling in information unwittingly demonstrate the need for intelligent design.
Charles Marshall at U.C. Berkeley represents establishment opinion in current evolutionary theory, and for good reason.
A substantive argument is a lovely thing to behold, to watch or to listen to, even if punctuated (in Myers’s case) by the usual grumpy insults.
As Yale’s David Gelernter has said of Darwinism, to challenge it is to “take your life in your hands.”