Whether the subject is evolution or climate change, the purpose of accusing someone of “science-denial” is to keep that person in line.
It’s hot out. Be glad that you’re a human being, and not some other kind of mammal.
If the future of science is really at risk, then surely not debating evolution is folly.
Two evolutionists publish a paper in a scientific journal comparing car evolution with biological evolution. Are they serious?
Good grief, if we face total calamity by the end of the century, why in the world wouldn’t you debate the science?