Whether the subject is climate change or evolution, who determines what is considered scientific fact? A climate scientist weighs in.
The more mistakes, the likelier the collapse — not the successful construction of new complex body plans.
The “anti-science” label is like Frankenstein’s monster.
Says…Michael Shermer, no less?
Absurd habits of thinking can collapse on themselves, suddenly, like the Dutch tulip mania of the 17th century.