Can we be frank? Cootsona’s treatment of ID is pathetic. As “scholarship,” it’s embarrassing.
In retrospect, where does the evidence stand? Here’s a summary: Venema’s main claims in light of the relevant science.
It’s ironic to find Dietrich Bonhoeffer cited by Dennis Venema.
Writing with Arthur Herman, he proposes a cheap and technologically very attainable alternative to waiting passively to see what comes of North Korea’s growing ICBM collection.
A final case where biologist Dennis Venema deals with evidence that is irrelevant to the existence of Adam and Eve is his claim about ORFan genes.