You will be astonished by how corrupt science can become when reviewers are “very, very vigilant” to protect consensus science.
Winston Ewert’s results are a Copernican Revolution moment.
Compromises are driven by the limitations of a material world, but also by the vision that lies behind the design.
The problem is, none of these people cite papers or other writing by researchers on intelligent design, like the work done by Douglas Axe on protein evolution probabilities.
If he chose to, could God use a sandstorm to turn a block of marble into a representation of the human form that would put Michelangelo’s David to shame?