Turner classifies the intelligent design movement as a resurgence of Platonic idealism.
Natural selection can explain “the survival of the fittest but not the arrival of the fittest.”
To those who say ID advocates are only critical of Darwinism because they are not sufficiently versed in genetics, I have a two-word reply.
Darwin’s ideas have become a flashpoint in the culture, so any discussion of the science can easily become highly polarized and politicized.
Charles Marshall at U.C. Berkeley represents establishment opinion in current evolutionary theory, and for good reason.