This is one key issue on which proponents of ID and of theistic evolution differ.
The standard evolutionary model is incapable of driving major transformations such as a fish evolving into an amphibian.
The design inference is obvious but often implicit, because explicit acknowledgement of design in biology carries with it substantial career risk.
There are innumerable descriptions and definitions of theistic evolution. How things are phrased matters a lot.
It’s ABD — “Anything But Design,” as Sarah Chaffee says — that is, anything but design that might leave open the door to a source of transcendent intelligence.