You can’t attack ID for identifying, but also for not identifying, the designer.
Yeah, that’s right, and seemingly without irony either.
The opening chapter of Epistemology and Science Education: Understanding the Intelligent Design Controversy has zero citations to any ID literature yet managed to conclude that “there are numerous examples of how scientific discourse and practices are perverted by proponents of ‘intelligent design.'”
Molecular genetics professor Robert Saunders was sent an invitation which he accepted, though he didn’t turn up for the event. However he decided to blog about it anyway.
Is this all it takes to get published by Cambridge University Press these days?