Science doesn’t need methodological naturalism. It doesn’t need methodological theism, either.
Oh, it’s very difficult to concede that you were mistaken about something. Especially, I would say, for males.
A participant did not like that I called his origins model “idiosyncratic,” or that I characterized the reaction to it as “cautious.” Oh well.
I asked fairly innocuous questions, realizing that I was being allowed to participate as long as I didn’t cause strife.
Lennox, the Oxford mathematician, answers common questions regarding apparent tensions between Scripture and scientific evidence.