This, from a critic seeking to dissuade viewers from the intelligent design position, is the carefully selected metaphor for casting ID as emotionally cold and remote?
“The human eye is a well-tread [sic] example of how evolution can produce a clunky design,” writes Professor Lents.
For remarkable blindness to his own “thinking errors,” Dr. Shapiro gets a prize.
By all means, if they’re discovering new common ground with ID, warmly welcome these good people and thoughtful scientists aboard.
In a physical world there will be design constraints, so it is only realistic to expect tradeoffs.