Coyne is sure this is going to come as a rude shock, to our colleague and contributor Dr. Behe in particular, “a slap in the face of IDers like Michael Behe — a fish slap like the one below.”
Alas, Coyne’s review of Darwin Devolves has too little intellectual content to sustain any real engagement.
Writing in the journal Science, reviewers Lents, Swamidass, and Lenski make a very specific, clear, strong, and unambiguous claim.
To me, this kind of back and forth is more amenable to serious discussion and reflection than quick volleys on a discussion board.
I found their review utterly convincing — although probably not in the way the authors might hope.