May a teacher let students know what evolutionary biologists had to say about their own field at the November 2016 Royal Society meeting?
Explaining this sort of phenomenon by slight, successive modification, as Darwin envisaged, seems problematic.
Avoiding serious discussion of design in nature (and of many other questions) fills a need.
For remarkable blindness to his own “thinking errors,” Dr. Shapiro gets a prize.
A little-known fact about intelligent design is that the majority of it scientists already perform their work alongside colleagues with differing views.