Rabbi Moshe Averick answers the who-designed-the-designer objection, shows how questions about God and ID can’t be shoved aside as unimportant.
“The human eye is a well-tread [sic] example of how evolution can produce a clunky design,” writes Professor Lents.
Miller is one of those “settled science” bullies. Here he sets his sights on essayist Marilynne Robinson.
I think it’s the first time I’ve heard a discussion of the second of law thermodynamics on cable TV.
Vertebrate eyes work reasonably well, Richard Dawkins conceded, but “it is the principle of the thing that would offend any tidy-minded engineer!”