How does one “convince” a robot of anything, when changing your mind about an issue implies free will, which materialists are impelled to deny?
This is fascinating stuff that flies in the face of the viewpoint treasured and defended by prestige academia and the mainstream media.
As others have said before me, one of the first things you notice about ID critics is the low level of most of their critiques.
Some guy once wrote that there’s nothing new under the sun. He must have had political conservatives’ pro-Darwin arguments in mind.
Razib Khan explains why “evolutionary biology is nothing for conservatives to fear,” since “it is one of the crowning achievements of modern Western civilization.”