Sometimes you don’t need a rigorous logical, scientific, or mathematical demonstration to reveal evidence of design in nature.
For my part, I think it’s better to approach the data without assumptions and to let the evidence speak for itself.
Mathematics has been at the foundation of modern challenges to neo-Darwinism, while those challenges are met mostly with handwaving.
A number of theories as to how life could have originated through entirely unintelligent processes have been proposed, but none are plausible.
In order to think scientifically, you must have an advanced degree in science. Right?