That Darwinism seems even superficially plausible depends completely on the ability of living things to reproduce themselves without significant degradation.
It’s fine to search through random results for an outcome you’re aiming for. Just don’t call it Darwinian evolution.
Professor Behe traces the errant thinking to an outdated mathematical picture taken from Ronald Fisher and his 1930 book, The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection.
My kids will you confirm for you how much I admire brevity. I’m a broken record on the subject of being concise.
As Lönnig points out, Richard Dawkins and others are at great pains to deny the connection. Why would that be?