Obviously, this is a subject that bears directly on the Darwin debate. Evolution skeptics were the canary in this particular coal mine.
In a 2005 article, Michael Powell begins by half-apologetically acknowledging that his newspaper has, in the editorial pages, taken a harsher view of ID than he evidently does.
There is some evidence that once again, the diapason of opinion is being changed. The claims of intelligent design are too insistent and too plausible to be frivolously dismissed.
Somehow, G. sulfurreducens “know” how to assemble molecules in their pili in an exact sequential and functional order.
Radical environmentalists intend to thwart human thriving in order to “save the planet.”